AuthorKing, Jeff, 1973-
TitleJudging social rights / Jeff King
Imprint New York : Cambridge University Press, 2012
Descript xxvii, 370 p. ; 23 cm

SUMMARY

Countries that now contemplate constitutional reform often grapple with the question of whether to constitutionalise social rights. This book presents an argument for why, under the right conditions, doing so can be a good way to advance social justice. In making such a case, the author considers the nature of the social minimum, the role of courts among other institutions, the empirical record of judicial impact, and the role of constitutional text. He argues, however, that when enforcing such rights, judges ought to adopt a theory of judicial restraint structured around four principles: democratic legitimacy, polycentricity, expertise and flexibility. These four principles, when taken collectively, commend an incrementalist approach to adjudication. The book combines theoretical, doctrinal, empirical and comparative analysis, and is written to be accessible to lawyers, social scientists, political theorists and human rights advocates. -- From back cover


CONTENT

Part I. The Case for Constitutional Social Rights -- The case for social rights -- The value of courts in light of the alternatives -- A basic interpretive approach


SUBJECT

  1. Social rights -- United States
  2. Judicial power -- Social aspects -- United States
  3. Constitutional law -- United States
  4. Political questions and judicial power -- United States
  5. Social justice -- United States
  6. Social rights -- Philosophy

LOCATIONCALL#STATUS
Central Library (5th Floor)342.085 K53J CHECK SHELVES