ความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างปัจจัยคัดสรรกับความตั้งใจจัดฟันตามแฟชั่นของนักเรียนมัธยมศึกษาตอนต้น / บุศยา ไชยเวช = Relationships between selected factors and intention to pseudo orthodontics among secondary school students / Butsaya Chaiyawech
Now a day the Pseudo Orthodontics of adolescence increases, Due to the major objective is beautiful and fashionable that the main factor are problem and effect are adolescent until dead. The purpose of this predictive correlational research was to study the factors of discriminants efficiency intention to Pseudo Orthodontics among secondary school students. Four hundred and fifty secondary school students aged 12-15 years old, were recruited from a simple random sampling in the secondary public school, office of the Basic Commission, Ministry of Education. The instruments used for data collection were the demographic data, the attitude, the subjective norms, the perceived behavioral control and the intention questionnaires. All questionnaires were tested for content validities by five panel of experts, and the reliabilities were .81, .92 and .71, respectively (except the intention questionnaire, that had only one item). The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s product moment correlation, and discriminants analysis. The results were revealed that: 1. The mean score of attitudes was a low level (X̅ = 78.15, SD = 33.97). The mean score of subjective norms was a low level (X̅ = 21.02, SD = 14.46). The mean score of perceived behavioral control was a low level (X̅ = 40.26, SD = 12.28). The mean score of intention to Pseudo Orthodontics was a low level (X̅ = 1.06, SD = 0.24). 2. The attitude, and the subjective norms were positively related to the intention to Pseudo Orthodontics among secondary school students. (r = .22 and .20 respectively). The perceived behavioral control was negatively related to the intention to Pseudo Orthodontics among secondary school students. (r = -.09, p < .05). 3. The attitude, the subjective norms, and the perceived behavioral control were significantly discriminants efficiency explained 6 % and predicting corrected about 70.4 % (Canonical correlation = .245, p < .05).
