การประเมินหลักสูตรเกษตรศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต แขนงวิชาส่งเสริมการเกษตร มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช / เฉลิมศักดิ์ เย็นสำราญ = An evaluation of Master of Agriculture Program in Agricultural Extension, Sukhothaithammathirat Open University / Chalermsak Yensamran
To evaluate the Master of Agriculture Program in Agricultural Extension, Sukhothaithammathirat Open University by using CIPP Model. Document analysis and six curriculum evaluation questionnaires were conducted for data collection. The population were full faculty members, graduate course production and management committees, thesis co-advisors, thesis examination committees (outsiders), master's degree graduates and their work supervisors, comprising of 124. The statistics used for analyzing data included the percentage, mean, and standard deviation which were run by SPSS/PC+ program. Research findings showed as follows: Context evaluation showed that the objectives of the curriculum were most appropriate to outside factors, social and student needs. The students could develop cognitive, effective and psychomotor domains. The content of the objectives were easy for understanding and very applicable for work. The structure of curriculum such as specific courses thesis and total credits were most appropriateand the time of duration for Graduate Professional Experience Intensive Training was most appropriate too. The number of credits for core courses and electives were very appropriate. The course contents were most appropriate to the objectives of curriculum, the usefulness for academic and profession, while they were very appropriate to social and student needs and present situations. The method and criteria of evaluation were most appropriate. Input evaluation indicated that the teaching staff and students were most appropriate for teaching and learning process. Teaching and learning supports were very efficient, high quality, and convenient for the use of services. Process evaluation revealed that curriculum administration and services were very appropriate, while teaching and learning processes were most appropriate. A measurement and evaluation of teaching and learning were very appropriate. Product Evaluation concluded that the graduates' characteristics were very appropriate to the objectives of the curriculum. The capabilities for application of knowledge to professional work were most appropriate.
