At present economic crimes go through the normal judicial process in spite of the fact that the nature and form of economic crimes do differ from those of normal crime in many aspects. The evidence of economic crime involves high technology but there is a lacking of law to govern the principle of proof of such evidence. The process in the normal procedure does take a very long period of time. The normal judicial process is not suitable for economic crimes. It is necessary that the hearing of economic crime should be specially arranged to suit the particular kind of crimes. For the offender of economic crime are knowledgeable, expertised and assisted by legal advisors. They always look for loop-hole of law to commit the economic crime. The hearing and sentencing of economic crime should require that the judges must be knowledgeable in the being of the economy and able to keep pace with the business and economic crimes. The judicial process itself should be developed to cope with economic crime to ensure that the evidence shall be well protected, the deposition shall be put in place, the hearing shall be continuous, affidavit shall be applied in the testimony of parol witness, the hearing of computerized data shall be put in place and the verbatim record of the testimony shall be used. The system of work should be consistent and congenial toward each other so that the administration of justice can be swift and accurate to the effect that offenders shall be punished and thereby economic crimes shall be prevented and suppressed for the betterment of the good citizenry.
