Page 68 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 68

62         ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                  so common  as comparisons  of the world's  production
                  of wheat, for instance, in which this difference of quality
                  is ignored, and fine  reasonings  are  indulged in where
                  this  difference  of  quality  might  seriously  affect  the
                  result.  What is  true of grain  is  as  true, if not  more
                  true,  of live stock.  There are  sheep  and sheep, cattle
                  and cattle, horses and horses;  in truth the agricultural
                  live stock  of any two countries, instead  of being sus-
                  ceptible  of ready comparison, can hardly be compared
                  directly at all.  The  point  is  notoriously of gre.it  im-
                  portance  in  historical  investigations.  In  comparing
                  England of the present day with  the  England of pre-
                  vious  centuries  the  difference  of the  average  weight
                  and quality of the live stock called by the same names
                  has  always  to  be  considered.  In  nothing  in  recent
                  years, as I understand, have some continental countries
                  such  as France made  more  remarkable  improvement
                  than in the quality of their live  stock, so that with no
                  increase in  numbers, or little  increase, there has been
                  an enormous advance in real production.  But the point
                  is of equal importance in international comparisons.  If
                  Australia  is  to  reckon with  competitors  in wool  pro-
                  duction, like the Argentine Republic, the average clip
                  per  sheep  in  the  respective  countries  is  obviously  a
                  necessary coefficient in the calculation, and it becomes
                  of  great  importance  to  study  in  what  countries  the
                  average  is  increasing  or  diminishing,  and  so  on.
                  Officials at the  head of the agricultural department in
                  France have been greatly impressed by considerations
                  like these, and have endeavoured to substitute a count
                  of cattle by weight  for  the  mere  count  of heads, but
                  even a  correction like  this would by no means be suf-
                  ficient,  as  there  might  still  be  serious  differences  of
                  quality.  The comparisons,  then,  of agricultural  pro-
                  duction which one often sees, in which unlike units are
                  taken  as  equal without  more  ado, and  reasoned upon
                  as if there were no qualifications, are most misleading.
                  Rectification  to any exact  degree  might  not  in  many
                  comparisons  be possible but the  consideration  of the
                                         f
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73