Page 69 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 69

ON  INTERNATIONAL  STATISTICAL COMPARISONS   63
                  point would usually make it possible to turn the figures
                  to support some useful conclusion.
                    In connection with these comparisons, it should also
                  be noticed that many of the  deductions  per head  and
                  per acre, into which it is usual to convert the figures of
                  agricultural production, are calculated to mislead, even
                  when  the units themsel ves are comparable, because the
                  comparisons are with the total acreage and total popu-
                  latioQ  of a  country, and  not  with  the  special  acreage
                  and a~ricuItural population.  What could be more use-
                  less,  for  instance, than  to  compare  two  countries  like
                  England  and  the United  States as regards their pro-
                  duction of wheat or any other agricultural product per
                  head of the whole population, the one population living
                  on  its  own  wheat  and  other  products,  and  the  other
                  not?  All such comparisons  to be  of any value  should
                  be made from  the  purely agricultural  point  of view-
                  to illustrate differences in the style of agriculture carried
                  on, or in  the fertility  of any two  countries.  But they
                  are  often  made  with  lingering  notions  that all  States
                  can, to some extent, be dealt with as agricultural units,
                  which  is far from being the case.
                     Coming to statistics of manufacturing production-
                  and  this  to  some  extent  applies  to  agricultural  and
                  mining  production-what we  find  is  that.  save as  to
                  some particular industry in detail, and for the purposes
                  of discussions of that industry by itself, there is  really
                  no  common denominator between countries, except  in
                  so far as  the production  of their  respective  industries
                  can  be  represented  in  money.  The coal  and  iron of
                  one  country are not the same as the coal and iron  of
                  another;  the wool is not the same;  the cotton, woollen,
                  and linen manufactures of the one cannot be expressed
                  in the same units of quantity as the similar manufactures
                  of the  other;  the  same with  manufactures of metals,
                  leather,  and  wood,  and  with  machines  of all  kinds.
                 . Even  if there  is  a  general likeness in industrial char-
                  acteristics between any two countries such as England
                  and France, yet the different distributions of the leading
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74