Page 318 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 318

310       ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES AND  STUDIES
                    that with £2 6s. 6d.  per head in 189 I, the people were
                    much less burdened than with £2  lOS.  8d.  per he~d in
                    1861, and that they would be no  more  burdened  now
                   than they were formerly, even if there should be a con-
                   siderable  increase  in  the  expenditure  per head.  The
                   point is one for investigation and not for assumption on
                   any side.  That there has been an enormous increase of
                   wealth is however obvious from two sets of facts, which
                   are corroborated by many olhers.  First, there has been
                   an enormous increase in the consumption of such articles
                   as  tea  and  sugar,-in  the former  case  from  2.69Ibs.
                   per head in  186 I  to 6. I  1 lbs.  per head in  1900, and in
                   the latter from  3s-1lbs. to 881bs. per head (see supple-
                   mentary tables), increases which would have been im-
                   possible without a  material  improvement in  the well-
                   being of the masses.  Next there has been an enormous
                   increase of the yield of a  penny of the income tax, from
                   £1,100,000 in 1861  to £2,400,000 at the present time
                   (see Table IX.), although in the interval the lower limit
                   of the tax has been raised from £100 to £160, and the
                   limit up to which abatements are given has been raised
                   from  £150 to £700.  It cannot be  assumed  then that
                   the country is now burdened more in proportion to its
                   resources by the expenditure of the present time than
                   it  was  by  the  expenditure of  70  mimon  £  in  1861.
                   Both  sides  of  the account have  to be looked at,  and
                   not one only.
                     The growth  of expenditure about  1861, it  may  be
                   interesting  to  note, was  discussed  at the  time just as
                   the expenditure of the  present day is  being discussed
                   in  some quarters.  On Jrd June,  1862,  Mr.  Stansfeld
                   moved a resolution of protest against growing expendi-
                   ture, and was strongly supported, Mr. Disraeli dwelling
                   on  "bloated  armaments,"  while  Cobden  and  other
                   authorities joined in  the  onslaught.  There was,  how-
                   ever,  no real discussion of what the expenditure of the
                   State should be and  for  what  purposes,  and  of what
                   could really be borne by the community, any more than
                   there is now or ever has been at any time in my recol-
   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323