Page 123 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 123

I 16      ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                  per annum,  that the  stimulus  thereby  given  to  other
                  industries  must  apparently  have far  more  than  com-
                  pensated  any  loss  caused  by  the  stimulus of foreign
                  bounties to sugar production and refining abroad.  But
                  to enlarge on this point would involve the introduction
                  of controversial matter, which  I am  anxious  to  avoid.
                   I am content  to  show that  nothing that can  have re-
                  sulted from sugar bounties could have affected seriously
                  the general rate of material growth in the country-
                     Mutatis mutandis, the  same  remarks apply to other
                  foreign  bounties,  of which  indeed  the  only ones  that
                  have been at all heard  of are  those  on  shipping.  But
                  as  yet,  at  least,  the  increase  of foreign  shipping has
                  not  been  such  as  to  come  into  comparison with  our
                  own  increase,  while  the  portion  of the  increase  that
                  can  be  connected  with  the  operation  of  bounties  is
                  very small.  I t would  be  useless  to  enter into figures
                  on so small a point;  but few figures are so well  known
                  or accessible as those .dating to shipping.
                     In neither  way, then, does  there appear to  be any-
                  thing  in  the  assertion  that  the  protectionist  action of
                 . foreign  Governments  in  recent years can have caused
                  the check alleged to the ·rate of growth in our industry
                  generally, assuming  such a check to have occurred.  I
                  may  be  dispensed,  therefore,  from  entering  on  the
                  theoretical  argument, which  I  only  notice  in  passing,
                  that in the nature of things no enhancement of foreign
                  tariffs and  no  grants  of foreign  bounties could  really
                  check  our  own  rate  of  growth,  except  by  checking
                  foreign  growth  s~ill  more,  which  is  not  the  case  we
                  are considering,  because the  allegation  is that foreign
                  competition  is  increasing  at our expense.  That I  do
                  not insist on this argument is  not  to  be considered as
                  a  sign that it is dropped, or that I am not fully sensible
                  of its  logical  completeness.  It seems  enough, at pre-
                  sent, to fortify it by considerations from actual practical
                  facts which no one can dispute.
                    The  question of an increase  of foreign  competition
                  from  natural  causes  is  more  difficult.  I t is beyond all
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128