Page 127 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 127

120       ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                  been at the extreme about 50 per cent.  Between 1870-
                  74  and  1880-84 instead  of an increase  there  is a de-
                  crease, viz., from £ 7 7S.  5d. to £6 I2S. 9d., but deducting
                  about one-third  from  the  former  figure  for the  fall  in
                  prices,  the real increase in the last ten years would ap-
                  pear to be as from £4 16s. 3d. to £6 12S. 9d., or over 35
                   per cent.  The difference in the rate of increase in  the
                  last ten years compared with  the previous  ten is thus
                  the difference between 35  and  50 per cent. only,  equal
                  to  about  £21,000,000  annually  on  the  amount  of
                  £  140,000,000, assumed to represent the value of British
                  industry in our foreign  exports, deduction being made
                  for the value of raw material included.  A deduction of
                  this sort from the annual  income of the country is too
                  small  to  account for  such  a  check to the rate  of our
                  growth  generally  as  that  we  are  now  discussing  as
                  probable, especially when we  recollect that the labour
                  is  only diverted, and it is  not the whole £2 I ,000,000
                  that is  lost,  but only the difference  between that sum
                  and  what  is  otherwise earned,  which  may even  be  a
                  plus and not a minus difference.
                     To bring the matter to a point, an increase of 40 per
                  cent. in the income of the country in  ten  years would
                  on an assumed  income of 1,000 millions  qnly in  1875,
                  -and the  figure  must  then  have  been  more,-have
                  brought the  income up  to  1,400 millions;  an increase
                  of 20 per cent. would have brought it up to  1,200 mil-
                  lions only,  a difference of 200 millions, which must have
                  arisen from the alleged difference in the rate of our ma-
                  terial  growth  in  question  if it had occurred.  Clearly
                  nothing can have happened in our foreign trade to ac-
                  count for  anything  more than the  smallest  fraction of
                  such a difference.  The figures are altogether too small.
                  We may repeat  again  then that it  is  not  the check to
                  our foreign  trade which foreign  competition may have
                  caused to which we can ascribe the recent check to our
                  general rate of growth.
                     I  need  hardly  add  that  in  point of theory foreign
                  competition  was  not likely  to  have the  effect  stated.
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132