Page 465 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 465
INDEX 457
ST~'tISTICS, necessity (or teach- third of entire taxation o( the
!ng,to .. emedy their wrong use. country. i. 259.
I. 379,' • TaxelOII .land (IS71], i. 253-276.
-.-. use 0(, for business puqfoses, Land tenure reform; ownership and
fl. 269. occupation of land, 253-254-
- utility o( common, ii. I. I. Thecase against existing burdens
STEAMERS, effects or, in raising on land. Fallacies of statement
that land compared wilh other
wages of seamen, i. 390. property is overburdened, 255-
STRIKE, injury to the United 257·
Kingdom (rom a big, compared The objection of taxation being a
with that caused by the South hindrance to trade does not apply
to real properly, Z 58.
African War, ii. 212. Maximum laxation which falls on
land according to Mr. Goschen's
TAUSSIG, Mr., on protection in Report about,twenty million £,
excluding income tax; taxation
United States and its probable affecting real property nearly
decay, ii. 18S. one-third of entire taxation of
TAXES, changes in British, 1861- country, and apparently unduly
heavy, 259.
J9 QI , ii. 336. I. Stamp duties on deeds, n6 case
Taxation and Representation 0/ for their reduction, 259.
Ireland (1876], i. '77-281. 2. Probate and succession duties,
inequality of, 260.
Alleged over-taxation o( Ireland 3. Land tax not a burden upon
used as an argument as to its over- landowners, but a rent -charge,
representation in Parliament; ne- zoo.
cessity (or proportion in Parlia- 4, House duty and rates, incidence
mentary representation to wealth of I increase of rales not so great
and population I decreasing popu- as increase in value of real
lation of Ireland, 277. properly. which has risen hom
Ireland's representation in Parlia- fifty-three million £ in 181 S tt)
ment 16 per cent.; its contribu- one hundred and (orty· three
tions to the Exche~uer only loper million!. in 1868; unearned in-
cent. ; impossibibty of taxIng crement, 261-262.
Ireland in proportion to its re- S. Rates: supposed increase of
presentation, as its contributions rates incorrect, the bulk of mo-
would be twelve million £. in- dern increase has been in im-
stead of 7.97 million £. 278. provement rates, 264-265.
Conditions at time of Union as re- II. Land Tenure Reform Associa-
gnrds population different; in tion's claims (or securing to the
18ar. population of Ireland 32 Slale a share of unearned in-
per cent. of population of United crease of value, right in principle,
Kingdom, in 1875 only 16 per 266-26Z'
cenl •• 279-280. llr. Mill s su~tion for a perio-.
Evils of excessive representation of dica1 State mquiry into increase
Ireland in Parliament and neces- of rental of land and objection.
sity (or its reduction. 281. thereto, 268-269.
Working of the forir taxes and
the cuaslr, in France; annual
TAXATION of Ireland in propor- value o( real property in France
• tion to its Parliamentary repre- in 1821 sixty-four million£,now
sentation an impossibility, i. one hundred and sixty million £,
278. ~ but increase in land tax only from
I I. 7 millioll!. to 12-3 million!.,
-- reduced pressure of, on the 269·-
masses, i. 233. Greater"e1asticity of English land
-- of real property nearly one- taxes; suggested local maiDIeDo

