Page 376 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 376

368        ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                                                         f
                  -for food,  for shelter, for clothing, for defence against
                  internal  and  foreign  enemies;  and  that  only  a  small
                  surplus, comparatively, remains for the higher ends of
                  life-for  education,  for  assisting  in  religious  c4lture,
                  for  amusement, for  literature, for  art, and  the  miscel-
                  laneous objects of civilized existence.  But to show how
                  the matter looks  on a large scale,  I  may be permitted
                  to refer to the method and the figures employed in re-
                  ports to the British Associat<;on  twenty to twenty-two
                  years ago by a special committee comprising Mr. J evons,
                  Mr.  Leone Levi, Mr. Stephen  Bourne, and other dis-
                  tinguished authorities,  Mr.  Leone Levi  being the  re-
                  porter of the committee. l   This committee then found
                  that out of a total estimated expenditure by the people
                  of the  United Kingdom, amounting to 878 million £,
                  no less than £500,400,000, or 56.9 per cent., was spent
                  on  food  and  drink;  £147,800,000, or 16.8  per  cent.,
                  on dress;  £121,700,000 on "house,"  including  house
                  rent, furniture, coal, gas, and water, while, among other
                  items,  there  were  1.5  per cent.  spent on  tobacco,  1.3
                  per cent.  on  education  (less  than on  tobacco),  1.4 per
                  cent.  on  church (also  less  than  on  tobacco),  0.8  per
                  cent.  on  literature,  0.6  per  cent.  on  newspapers, and
                  0.7 per cent.  each on "theatres  and  music  halls" and
                  other  amusements.  This  statement,  I  believe,  was
                  obviously incomplete, and  defects were pointed out in
                  it at the time, as,  for instance, its omission  of locomo-
                  tion and its failure to deal sufficiently with the expense
                  of government, while  a  farther  distinction  was drawn
                  between gross and net expenditure and figures differing
                  from  the above given for the net expenditure, the total
                  being about 200 million £ less;  but the calculations, as
                  far  as  they go, are  most  carefully done, and leave no
                  dou  bt as to what  are  the  main  purposes to which  the
                  aggregate income of the people is devoted.
                    Applying and adapting the figures thus given to the
                  present time, .I have drawn up a table (see Appendix A)
                    1  See" Proceedings" of meetings at Southampton and Southport
                  in 1881 and 1882.
   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381