Page 154 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 154

146        ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                  be found.  But clearly what is true of the one mischief
                  may  not  be  true  of the  other  mischief, and  may not
                  compel to the same action.
                    A  similar illustration would be furnished by the well-
                  known case of the shilling duty on corn.  Import duties
                  on articles of food  to  protect  the  home-grower are,  of
                  course, bad economically;  but given a very small duty
                  of long standing, may not the disadvantages of remov-
                  ing it,  necessitating  an  addition  to  a  disproportionate
                  income tax, be greater on the whole  than  those of let-
                  ting it remain?  It is  the  question of degree, as in  the
                  previous  case  of inequality of taxation, which  is  here
                  the material question.
                     I  have  often  thought  that  the  principle  might  be
                  usefully applied in  the discussion  of Mill's  famous ex-
                  ception to the universal applicability of free trade prin-
                  ciples, viz.:  that import duties for protective purposes
                  might be permissible in new countries in order to begin
                  industries  naturally suitable,  an  idea  which  has  been
                  applied  by  other writers  to  manufacturing  industries
                  generally, the  alleged  object  being  to  give variety to
                  the economic regime of such countries and promote the
                  increase of a town population.  I need not say here that
                   Mill has been very much misrepresented.  His excep-
                  tion was a  very limited one, and was  no  more  than  a
                  statement that there  might  be  cases  for protection in
                  the way he mentioned, whereas his statement has been
                   used as an authority for every sort of protectionist mis-
                  chief,  in old as well as new countries.  But taking it in
                  its more exact and limited meaning, what seems to me
                  worthy of examination from a statistical view is whether,
                  in  fact,  manufacturing  industries  can  be promoted to
                  any material  extent  in  really new  countries,  so  as  to
                  give that variety to their economic regime which protec-
                   tionists contend for.  In other words, how much. variety
                  can so be given to the industries of a  new country?
                     Let us begin by quoting the exact words from  Mill,
                  in which  he gives a little counte~ance to protection for
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159