Page 129 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 129

t 22       ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES AND  STUDIES
                  among certain trades organized into trades unions;  but
                  the unions, after aU, only include about a tenth part of
                  the  labour  of the  country.  There  has  been  no  such
                  conspicuous shortening  of the hours of labour among
                  professional men,  clerks, domestic servants, and  many
                  others whose labour is an essential part of the general
                  sum total.  N ext-and this  is  perhaps even  more  im-
                  portant-the shortening of the  hours  of labour is  not
                  coincident  with  the  beginning  of the  last  ten  rears,
                  though it has  been  in  full  operation for  the whole  of
                  that period, but rather with the beginning or middle of
                  the previous ten years, viz.,  1865-75;  so that it should
                  . have  been  fully  in  operation  upon  the production  of
                  1875;  and the  check  to  our  rate  of growth  if due to
                  this cause should thus have been felt between 1865 and
                  187 5, rather than between the latter date and the present
                  time.  The same  with  the general  disposition  to take
                  things  easy.  This disposition  did. not spring  up  in  a
                  day in  1875,  but was probably as effective as a cause of
                  change in the earlier, as in  the  later, period.  It  must
                  count for something as a cause of the annual production
                  of the  country  being  less  at a  given  moment  than  it
                  would  otherwise  be;  but  in  comparing  two  periods,
                  what we have to consider is whether the growth of this
                  disposition  has  been  greater  in  one  period  than  in
                  another;  and there are no data to  support such a con-
                  clusion as regards the last ten years compared with the
                  previous ten.
                    We  must  apparently, therefore, reject this explana-
                  tion also.  It is not adequate to account for the apparent
                  change that has occurred in the rate of our growth from
                  the year  1875 as compared with the period just before.
                  Our progress in periods previous to 1875 took place in
                  spite of the operation of causes of a similar kind which
                  were then in operation, and there is no proof at all  that
                  the shortening of the hours of labour and the growth of
                  a ctisposition to take things easy have been greater since
                  1875 as compared with the period just before than they
                  were  between  1865  and  1875  as.  compared  with  the
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134