Page 98 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 98

92        ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                    and lower professional classes-the very classes, it may
                   be remarked, by whom the strain of modern life is felt
                   the most intensely.
                      Th,e conclusion, then,  is,  that if the return to labour
                   generally is  not  proportionate  to  the increase  of the
                   severity of toil  itself, the  reason  must  be that people
                   are working for inadequate objects.  The game,  in one
                   sense, may  not  be worth  the  candle.  The problem is
                   another  form  of the very same problem that ha~ been
                   considered with reference to the payment of monopoly
                   rents.  On  the  whole,  notwithstanding  all  the  draw-
                   backs  of city  life,  there  is  some  improvement  which
                   makes  the  payment  of monopoly  rents  worth· while.
                    People  would  not  change  back  to  the  former  con-
                   ditions.  So,  on  the  whole,  notwithstanding  all  the
                   drawbacks of really severer toil, and the inadequacy of
                   the additional  remuneration,  people would .not change
                   back.  What has happened is really a revolution in  the
                   quality  of labour  and  the  general  conditions  of life.
                   The -net  gain, in  one  view,  is  less  than  the  apparent
                   gross  improvement, looking  at the matter strictly;  in
                   another view, the gain  is so great as to make the pre-
                   sent condition of workmen on the average incommen-
                   surable with their former condition.  The two things are
                   not on the same plane, and can hardly be compared.
                      An  important  corollary  seems  to  be  suggested  by
                   these considerations.  If there is so much doubt about
                   the adequacy of the  reward  for  the  additional  labour
                   thrown  on  workmen  by  the  conditions  of  modern
                   society, is not  that  reward really a  minimum reward?
                   In  other words,  may  not  the  amount  of  production
                   itself be conditioned  by the  energy  of the  workman,
                   which is in turn a function of the food and other things
                   on which  he expends  his wages, so that the quality of
                   labour by which modern society is carried on would not
                   itself exist  if the  remuneration  were  less  than  it  is?
                   The complaint weare dealing with is that of the severity
                   of modern toil, and implies that the workman is tasked
                   to_his full. capacity, and  can  just  do  the work, so that
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103