Page 95 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 95

GROSS  AND  NET GAIN  OF  RISING WAGES   89
                   go to, when  machines  improve, is thus not so easy to
                   determine d pnon:
                     It is  also  obvious  that even  in  an  advancing com-
                   munity the remuneration of certain kinds of labourers,
                   whose  numbers continue  disproportionate,  may either
                   not  increase  at aU,  or  increase very little,  the  whole
                  gain from increased productiveness being for the benefit
                  of the labourers whose own labour improves in quality,
                  apart from  the fact  that  it  is employed  on  more  pro-
                  ducti~e machines.  Strictly speaking,  unless there is a
                  rise in the scale of living, accompanied by an improve-
                  ment in  quality all  round,  there  is  no  reason why,  in
                  modern  times, a man who can only drive a spade  into
                  the  ground,  or wheel  a  barrow,  or carry bricks  up  a
                  ladder, should receive any higher reward  than similar
                  labourers- in former ages.  The fact that such labourers
                  are little better off is not inconsistent with the fact that
                  workmen general1y receive a larger reward than in any
                  former period.
                    The way is thus cleared for answering the question as to
                  whether the remuneration of labour has increased gener-
                  ally in proportion to the increased severity of labour.
                    I t cannot be denied, first of all, that there i~ a great
                  increase of the productiveness of labour  itself, as well
                  as a great increase of the absolute amount of remunera-
                  tion.  This is  admitted  on  all  sides.  The increase  of
                  production  is  the very fact which  is assumed.  Nor  is
                  the increase of remuneration denied-the only question
                  is  of the  proportionate remuneration.  Before  passing
                  from this point, however, I should like to dwell a little
                  on the fact already referred  to, of an  improvement  in
                  the quality of non-mechanical  labour,  because, as this
                  labour is largely the subject of direct exchange without
                  much intervention of capital, the mere fact of improve-
                  ment  implies  almost  a  proportionate  increase  of  re-
                  muneration.  At any rate, the labourers concerned get
                  almost the whole  benefit,  because they exchange with
                  each  other.  I  refer  to such employments as  those  of
                  teaching. medical attendance, nursing, domestic service,
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100