Page 252 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 252

244         f5'!i6l  .,,!  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES

                  civil commotion or insurrection.  But we shall have no
                   true idea of what armies exist for  unless we  begin with
                   this,  perhaps in importance the highest, function of an
                   army.  The ultimate guarantee of civil order is, in fact,
                   the soldier.  The unarm~d policeman is nothing without
                   him, and no one can foresee  how necessary the soldier
                   may  at  any  moment  become.  We  have  a  standing
                  illustration in the case of Ireland, where a police force
                   is maintained which is reaIly'a military force, and with
                  a large number of Regular soldiers behind it.  Another
                   illustration is just being given in South Africa, where
                  the new police force is really being armed and organized
                  as a military body with  Regular forces  behind  it.  An
                   illustration of a different kind was afforded by the great
                  civil war in America.  If the United States  had  been
                  able to dispose at the beginning of the war of a Regular
                  army of 100,000 or even 50,000 men, there would have
                  been  no  civil  war.  The  losses  and  miseries  of four
                  years'  civil  strife, with  its enormous waste of human
                  lives, would  have  been  entirely prevented.  I t  is  not
                  cheap  for  a  nation,  therefore,  even  on  the  score  of
                  internal  policy,  to  be without an irresistible army for
                  all purposes of home defence.  I put down, then, as the
                  first object of an army, the maintenance of civil  order
                  in the State.
                     There is a special  reason for  mentioning this, as  it
                  is  not  unconnected  with  the  problem  or  ideal  of a
                  general disarmament, of which one hears so much.  The
                  problem is quite insoluble, for the simple reason, among
                  others,  that internal conditions are everywhere different.
                  Having regard to their own home conditions, the most
                  orderly and law-abiding peoples might perhaps disarm
                  completely, or nearly so, though the danger of so doing,
                  as we have seen, was only too strongly illustrated in the
                   United States.  But if they disarm they are immediately
                  at a disadvantage internationally in dea1ing with States
                  which  are obliged by internal  necessities  to  maintain
                  large armies-States like France, or Austria-Hungary,
                  or  Russia,  and  many  ot~ers.  Thus  the  existence  of
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257