Page 193 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 193

PROTECTIONIST  VICTORIES-FREE TRADE  SUCCESSES  185
                   men  of science,  however, we  must  put  our money,  I
                   believe, on the man of science.
                     Somehow or other, the world will  be the  richer for
                   all  these  inventions,  and  the  Mrs.  Partingtons  of
                  politics,  however  great  and highly  placed  they  may
                  seem  for  a  time  to  be,  will  only  make  themselves
                  ridiculous  by  striving  to  sweep  away  the  inrushing
                  ocean.
                     (5)  Last  of all we  mu~ notice, as making for  Free
                  Trade, the  rapid  growth  of conditions  in  the leading
                  countries of the world, especially in Germany and the
                   United  States,  such  as  those  which  existed  in  this
                  country when  it became  Free-Trading, and which, in
                  fact,  compelled it to be Free-Trading.
                     The modern  nations  are  all becoming great manu-
                  facturing States, where the manufacturing is partly for
                  export, and where, by this very condition, it is generally
                  able to hold its own at home and abroad in face of the
                  unrestricted competition of the world.  Such countries
                  have need of cheap food  and raw materials, which must
                  consequently be made free imports, and there is nothing
                  else that needs to be or can be Protected.
                     The  time  is  at  hand,  then,  when  our  great  rivals
                  nolens volens will be forced into the Free-Trade camp.
                     I  am  quite  aware  of  the  reluctance  of  Germany,
                  France, and Austria-Hungary to accept the inevitable.
                  They tight against cheap food and cheap raw materials,
                  essential to their prosperity, by duties for the Protection
                  of their agriculturists.  But the game is plainly a losing
                  one, as  they are finding  out (what we found  out long
                  ago) that protection of this sort does not protect.  We
                  may confidently await the issue.

                             The Future of the United States.

                    As far as the United States is concerned the position
                  is  even  clearer, because there  is  no question there of
                  Protection to agriculture.  I cannot do better than quote
                  some remarks from a distinguished American econom-
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198