Page 288 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 288

280        ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                  is the substance of much that I propose to say-is, that
                  the individual analogy fails in  the case of a community
                  or a  nation.  I t is of the essence of the indi vidual pro-
                  cess  of waste in  most  cases  that the  property of the
                  spendthrift or wastrel should be sold or transferred to
                  some other person or persons in the community, either
                  for no consideration or  in exchange  for goods  or  ser-
                  vices forming part of the accruing income of the com-
                  munity,  and  which  the  spendthrift  consumes.  The
                  spendthrift parts with property, with things which con-
                  stitute capital, and  receives, in exchange, other things
                  which are really income, and not capital, and which he
                  consumes,  that is,  if he receives  any actual equivalent
                  at all.  The  final  result is  that he and  his  capital  are
                  parted;  but the capital itself, the money,  the estate, or
                  the house, of which it consisted, remains, having passed
                  into  the  hands  of others, sometimes  without any real
                  equivalent, but, at other times, in exchange for part of
                  the accruing income in the hands of the people to whom
                  the spendthrift has transferred his property, and whose
                  share in the transaction is  really the  investment of an
                  amount equal to that which the spendthrift has parted
                  with.  There is waste of capital, accordingly, as respects
                  the individual, but there need be no waste, and usually,
                  I should say,  there is  no  waste, or very little waste in-
                  deed, as far as the community is concerned.  But when
                  we come  to the caSe  of a  community or a  nation  ex-
                  pending its capital there is,  plainly,  not the same room
                  as in the case of an individual for the process of selling
                  or transferring property, efther for no consideration, or
                  for commodities and services that are immediately con-
                  sumed, which makes the waste of capital so easy to the
                  individual.  There are  some questions,  perhaps, as  to
                  transfers of securities f('om  one  nation to another, but,
                  broadly speaking, a community cannot waste capital in
                  the same way that an individual may do by seI1ing pro-
                  perty and  consuming what is  obtained from  the sale.
                  A  community  cannot sell or transfer to  itself.  When
                  a community or nation,  therefore,  expends  or wastes
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293