Page 178 - clra62_0019-(GIPE)
P. 178

170       ECONOMIC  INQUIRIES  AND  STUDIES
                  but admitting his contention, where is the overwhelming
                  necessity  for  considering  a  change  in  our  monetary
                  standard?  It would serve the purposes  for which  it is
                  used very well,  with even  greater fluctuations  in  pur-
                  chasing power than there have been.
                    The second point I  wish to observe upon, is the way
                  in  which  Mr.  Williams  talks  of "suppressing  paper"
                  when  bullion  falls  in  price, -i.e.,  when  prices  rise,  be-
                  cause then the notes cover a greater quantity of bullion
                  than before, and the notes are only to be issued against
                  bullion  the  Government  holds;  and  of  "increasing
                  paper"  when  bullion  rises  in  price,  z,".e.,  when  prices
                  fall, because then more notes can be issued against the
                  same quantity of bullion, the assumption being that the
                  suppress.ion of paper will  make bullion  rise again, £.e.,
                  will  make  prices  fall,  and  that  the  increase  of paper
                  will make bullion fall  again,  z,".e.,  will  make  prices  rise.
                  In  this  way,  he  thinks,  fluctuations  of prices  will  be
                  automatically corrected.
                     This is  a  manner of speaking about  paper which  I
                  do  not  understand.  How is  an  issuing  institution  to
                  "suppress  paper"  or" increase  paper"  at will,  unless
                - it be inconvertible  and  managed paper?  There  is  no
                  will in the matter, unless it be that of the customers of
                  the institution, whose demands for paper may vary in-
                  definitely according to customs and habits of every sort
                  and kind, and whose demands  must be  complied with
                  automatically in  any credit system, if frequent shocks
                  to  credit are  to be avoided.  Sometimes  much  paper
                  will be wanted, as happened, for instance, after the City
                  of  Glasgow  Bank  failure  in  1878,  and  the  demand
                  must be met at any cost.  No  automatic regulation by
                  an issuing body is possible.  At other times less paper
                  will be wanted, and, equally, no issuing body can force
                  it, thbugh the attempt at forcing may produce disastrous
                  results.
                     N  ci  doubt  it  may  be  said  for  Mr. Williams's  idea
                  that there is much  in  the language of the authors  of
                  the  Bank Charter Act,  notwithstanding  their general
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183